Illegal fencing must go, residents told

Housing estates that have illegally fenced up their areas must now pull down the structure before Johor Baru City Hall takes action against them.

This is the city hall warning to residents who have illegally created gated communities.

Mayor Datuk Mohd Naim Nasir said it has identified 14 housing estates that have illegal fencing.

“We have issued three notices to three housing estate communities in the last two weeks. We will take action against the other 11 soon.”

He said records showed that none of the 14 housing estates had sought approval before installing the fences.

He warned that the city hall would in future tear down fences without giving notice.

Mohd Naim said this on Tuesday after launching SP Setia Bhd “Road to Charity” drive at Setia Tropika.

He said the council had no choice but to act against offenders as such fences had caused inconvenience to adjoining residential estates.

He said only standalone housing project that is isolated from other residential or business areas would be allowed to have a gated community.

“We know residents put up such fences to ensure their safety and security. However, this is not allowed.

“Alternatively, they should organise a neighbourhood watch like Rukun Tetangga.”

He said any housing estate that set up the neighbourhood watch scheme would be entitled to a RM4,800 subsidy to buy equipment such as torch lights.


Source:
https://www.hba.org.my/main.htm
03/03/2007
The Star
By Meera Vijayan

*******************

No legal right to block public road

Your report on gated and guarded communities and its current popularity (StarMetro May 10) did highlight one point which is an issue for concern as well.

The point mentioned is the right of passage of roads.

I am staying in Bukit Jalil and in order for me to access my house, I have to travel through Jalan 7/155B across Taman Esplanad to connect to Jalan 3/155B.

The problem is that this public road has been blocked by the residents of Taman Esplanad by erecting a barrier to stop outside vehicles from entering the public road.

Each time, I have to seek permission from the guards to get access through the public road to reach my house at the other end.

Sometimes the guards are not so obliging and I have to argue my way through. This is really getting out of hand at the public ‘sexpense.

I understand the residents of Taman Esplanade’s concern over security, but to block off a public road and cause inconvenience to others is not a solution.

Furthermore, they have no legal right to erect the barrier on a public road, especially so if it is used by other residents to gain access to their home via the same road and also there are bus stops located along the road.

Is the local authority able to act on this since the area is under the purview of DBKL?

LWS ,Kuala Lumpur

Source:
https://www.hba.org.my/main.htm
24/05/2007
The Star

******************

Wrong to retain documents

I REFER to the SMS sent by a reader on the issue of whether security guards in apartments or condos have the right to inspect and retain a visitor’s identity card. This practice is common in both stratified and non-stratified residential areas.

With reference to the National Registration Regulations 1990, these security guards do not have the authority or power to inspect or detain a visitor’s identity card.

Regulation 7 on the production and inspection of identity card states:

Any registration officer, police officer, customs officer or any member of the armed forces while on duty, and any other officer or class or description of public officer authorised in writing in that behalf by the director-general may inspect the identity of any person.

https://www.thestar.com.my/
LETTERS: Wrong to retain documents
Friday, 31 Aug 2018


Popular posts